Define constraints in the builder
Set required fields, field types, options, and validation patterns.
Form submission validation
KinoForms ties validation to the form schema, dependency rules, and field constraints so teams can catch missing, mismatched, or stale values early.
Problem
Missing required fields, stale select values, and irrelevant answers force reviewers to repair data instead of evaluating it.
KinoForms validation starts with field definitions, continues through conditional requirements, and gives reviewers a cleaner record to inspect when responses arrive.
Dependencies and schema validation
KinoForms lets teams model the logic behind the form: what should appear, what should be required, which options are valid, and which submissions are clean enough to review. The result is a conditional logic form builder that keeps the respondent experience and the stored schema in sync.
Equals, contains, ranges, regex, empty states, and more.
Show, hide, require, filter options, set limits, and clear values.
Rule graph
When application type is Scholarship
Require eligibility details and reviewer context
When budget is above the review threshold
Show approval notes and route the response for review
When country changes
Filter program options and clear stale selections
Schema guardrails
Required fields that change with the respondent path
Pattern, min/max, length, and option checks
Schema-aware submission data before the review queue
Rules that can hide, show, require, disable, or refine fields
When matched
If application type is Scholarship, show the eligibility field and require it before review.
Use cases
These examples keep the page focused on narrow form-workflow intent instead of broad form-builder copy.
Workflow steps
Use schema rules and conditional requirements to keep submitted data aligned with the workflow reviewers expect.
Set required fields, field types, options, and validation patterns.
Use conditional logic so fields become required only when the workflow makes them relevant.
Reduce missing, mismatched, and stale values before submissions reach reviewers.
Concrete examples
Require scholarship-specific eligibility answers only when the applicant chooses that track.
When a selected country changes, filter program options and clear stale choices that no longer apply.
Block records that are missing eligibility answers or path-specific fields before reviewers spend time on them.
Related pages
See how rules make validation change with the respondent path.
Use a template that includes eligibility and conditional document-review examples.
Follow validated response data into controlled review workflows.
See validation applied to guest, session, and attendee fields.
FAQ
Yes. A field can become required only when earlier answers make it relevant to the respondent path.
Yes. Dependency rules can filter allowed options and clear values that no longer fit the current answers.
Next step
Use schema rules and conditional requirements to keep submitted data aligned with the workflow reviewers expect.